Palladian Audit Extension
Dr James B. Juenger, D.C., 60, passed away on November 30, 2010 after a one-year battle with lung cancer. Dr Juenger graduated from Cornell University and Logan College of Chiropractic. He practiced in Trumansburg, NY for the past 32 years where his office staff and loyal patients became his extended family. Dr. Juenger was a NYSCA member for most of his professional career and held almost every district office at one time or another. He was always happy to help out a new practioner in any way. Dr. Juenger is survived by his 5 children, 9 grandchildren and two brothers. He was a truly devoted father, friend colleague, and mentor. He will be greatly missed by so many.
President Obama signed into law legislation that delays for one year the scheduled 25% cut in Medicare payment to doctors.
Medicare - Some good news for a change:
The Red Flags Rule requires creditors and certain businesses to develop and implement written identity theft prevention programs to help identify, detect and respond to patterns, practices or specific activities that could indicate identity theft. The applicability of the rule to health care providers has been debated over the past several months. On Tuesday, November 30, 2010, the Senate passed legislation (S3987) that clarifies the definition of a creditor and in effect would exempt health care providers from the Red Flags Rule. On December 7, 2010, the House of Representatives passed S3987 and sent the bill to President Obama. The President is expected to sign the bill before the Red Flags Rule goes into effect on January 1, 2011.
Thanks to the efforts of the ACA along with other healthcare provider groups whose efforts were instrumental in removing this additional administrative burden for doctors of chiropractic and other health care providers.
And more good news for a change:
The Senate has passed a $15 billion bill that would block the impending 25% cut in the Medicare payment rate to physicians and instead keeps rates steady through 2011. The cut was scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2011. It is likely that the House would pass the bill – it would by the fifth and longest extension of Medicare physican payment rates enacted this year and puts us back in the “yearly extension cycle” that we have all become familiar with. Unfortunately, the bill does not fix the sustainable growth rate (SGR) problem and doctors would be subject to a cut of more than 25% for treating Medicare patients in 2012 unless Congress figures out a long term solution in the meantime.
Update on NYS Workers Compensation fee schedule:
As you know, 97140 was not included in the chiropractic fee schedule. Carriers will be notified that the 97139 code (unlisted therapeutic procedures) will be used instead with the descriptor being the procedure that was performed. This code usually requires a report for the service, but that will not be necessary. The 97940 omission will be addressed in the future.
Effective December 1, 2010 the “new” C4 family of forms must be used. The exception is in the physician shortage are in Rochester where the forms go into effect Jan 1, 2011. These are the 4 page new patient C4 and the 2 page C4.2. The forms can be found on the NYS WCB website (click on the link below):
http://www.wcb.state.ny.us/content/main/Forms.jsp
And a reminder: Any condition that is resultant from a work related injury is compensable by workers compensation insurance. Under no circumstances, can the doctor charge the patient for any treatment related to a workers compensation injury (even if a variance is denied).
______________________________________________________________
The New York State Chiropractic Association is committed to the advancement of the chiropractic profession in New York State. Our officers, directors, delegates and district officers are working diligently on your behalf to protect your right to practice and to provide the highest quality services to the patients we serve.
Many plans have limits on how much can be paid out in coverage, limits which would be phased out under the new health reform law.
The feds though have granted waivers from that law, amid worry that certain Unions and Big Companies would drop their health insurance programs entirely. Those waivers are good for one year, and can be considered for renewal.
The list of the 222 733 Unions and Big Companieswaivers are available by clicking on the link below.
THE LIST
Both measures expected to receive quick White House approval
Medicare requires that services provided to a patient are authenticated in the patient health record. Hand written or electronic signatures are acceptable. A handwritten signature is a mark or sign by an individual on a document to signify knowledge, approval, acceptance or obligation. Signature must comply with the following:
* Stamp signatures are not acceptable.
* You must be familiar with your Local Coverage Determination (LCD) policy on authenticating records as these policies will take precedence over the guidelines below.
* If, in the course of a patient health record review, a signature is found to be illegible, Medicare contractors will look for a signature log or attestation statement to determine the identity of the provider.
* A signature log includes a list of the typed or printed name(s) of the author(s) of the associated initials or illegible signature(s).
* The signature log can be included on the page where the initials or signature are present, or may be in a separate document.
* Although a reviewer may encourage providers to list their credentials in the signature log, a claim should be not denied if the log is missing a provider’s credentials.
* All signature logs should be considered regardless of the date the log was created.
Attesting to a Signature’s Validity
Providers can include an attestation statement in the documentation they submit. Only the author of the medical record can attest to the record in question.
Attestations will be accepted by reviewers regardless of the date of the attestation, except in those cases where the regulations or policy indicate that a signature must be in place prior to a given event or a given date. For example, if a policy states the physician must sign the plan of care before therapy begins, an attestation can be used to clarify the identity associated with an illegible signature but cannot be used to “backdate” the plan of care.
CMS recommends that, rather than backdating a patient health record, providers should use the signature authentication process explained below. In some situations, a provider may be contacted by a contractor and asked to submit an attestation statement or signature log. Providers will have 20 calendar days from the date of the contractor’s call, or the date that the request letter is received by the post office, to provide the information. To be valid for Medicare medical review purposes, the attestation statement must be signed and dated and contain sufficient information to identify the beneficiary. An example is included below:
“I, _____[print full name of the physician/practitioner]___, hereby attest that the medical record entry for _____[date of service]___ accurately reflects signatures/notations that I made in my capacity as _____[insert provider credentials, e.g., DC]___ when I treated/diagnosed the above listed Medicare beneficiary. I do hearby attest that this information is true, accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and I understand that any falsification, omission, or concealment of material fact may subject me to administrative, civil, or criminal liability.”
The current requests for audits by Medicare are not an unusual review. In New York, there is currently a special services pre payment audit request for 98941 services as of October, 2010 and for 98942 services as of November 2009. Also, Medicare does ongoing CERT reviews on Chiropractic claims in which they will review records for proper documentation to support the claim and diagnosis that has been billed.
With the prepayment audit review, they seem to be sending a request letter for each patient and they are only asking for 3 months of records. A special services CERT request letter is usually 3-4 pages long, and they may ask for multiple patients or multiple dates of service, listed in chart form and they usually request 6 months of previous records.
According to Dr. Ritch Miller, ACA Medicare Committee chairman, you should and must comply. If for some reason you speak with anyone from the carrier/contractor, log the persons name, ID #, station number or whatever and write word for word what you are told. Normally we recommend not speaking with the contractor. KEEP TRACK OF EVERYTHING, and make 2 copies of everything you send to them.
Doctors are encouraged to review the Local Coverage Determination (LCD) for Chiropractic Services (L27350). LCDs can be accessed from the Medical Policy Center on the www.ngsmedicare.com web site; enter keyword L27350 in the Medical Policy Center search form field to access the Chiropractic Services policy. There is a detailed description on what you documentation should include for the initial visit and subsequent visits.
We also suggest before you start working on the audit, go to the ACA Medicare Webpage www.acatoday.org/medicare and read the links on audits/appeals. You and your staff should take the free 2 hour ACA Medicare documentation webinar. Then, we recommend that you read everything else on the webpage. You need to know everything you can about Medicare, now. So even if you think you know everything there is to know about Medicare, you need to read everything once again. In particular, some of the things (but not all) they are looking for include the diagnosis with a subluxation to correlate with the service code that is billed (98940, 98941, 98942). There should be a treatment plan for the condition. You should note the level of the subluxation adjusted. A PART exam should be done on the onset date of the condition treated with subsequent periodic re-exams and function assessments. Finally, every visit should be signed in full by the provider of the service. If you have not signed your notes attaché an attestation page with the visits. This can be found at www.ngsmedicare.com key word signature.
Other suggestions from Dr. Miller include the following. With regard to what documentation to send, we recommend you send everything in from the BOX 14 (CMS 1500) date on, even if it is a month or two longer than the 3 months, if that date is less than the 3 months then we suggest you send in 3 months documentation if the patient was treated at that time. Make sure you send all supporting documentation even if it is several years old, like the patients original intake forms if that has historical information on it, if this information is found in no other place in the records.
Many doctors’ first react with anger and frustration when they start to get these audits. That is not helpful and in past cases has made things a whole lot worse. Be as pleasant as you can be with anyone you speak with.
Only send in patient records, do not send in any explanatory letters or anything that is not an "official" patient record, since it can be used against you and since it is not official it cannot be used in your favor.
If you get denied on any of the claim(s), you we recommend that you consider an appeal, if the documentation supports the service billed, even if you are asked to return only $20. It is a temptation to not go further, but that may be seen as admission of guilt and they more than likely will continue with future audits.
Hopefully this won't turn into the battle that many other states are going through across the country, but you must prepare for the worst and expect the best. There are doctors across the country, (and again hopefully you are not one of them), that have been carrying on this battle for over two years. So you must take this very, very seriously.
The ACA is working on this with CMS and hopefully we can turn this around. Unfortunately, with the executive branch and administration's increased and well publicized focus on fraud and abuse, don't plan on that.
If you have any questions, please first go to the ACA webpage www.acatoday.org and see if you can find the answer there. If not please contact Dr. Lupinacci or Dr. Penna. If you have any questions specific to this notice, please feel free to contact either of us also.
Sincerely,
Dr. Louis Lupinacci, DC
NY Medicare Chiropractic CAC Rep
Dr. Mariangel Penna, DC
NY Alternate Medicare CAC Rep
WC changes are here as of Dec 1, 2010. Learn how to treat your patients and get paid under the new system.
Chiropractic Services have been Unbundled!
Learn how to correctly bill modalities and avoid costly mistakes.
The forms, the treatment, get the information you need now by clicking on the link below!
Workers’ Compensation Program
The House of Representatives has passed legislation temporarily stoping the 23% cut in physician payments under Medicare scheduled to take effect on Dec. 1. The same measure has already passed the Senate.
The ICC is a non-profit organization that encourages a high code of ethics among practitioners, researchers, educators and others in the chiropractic profession. The Fellow designation is bestowed upon those whose contributions have made or who will make significant impact upon the science of chiropractic and to those who render valuable and meritorious service to the profession.
The committee after careful consideration has invited Dr. Penna to become a Fellow. In his letter to Dr. Penna, James Mertz, D.C., Secretary-Treasurer of ICC, stated, “your record of outstanding service has richly earned this honor for you.” Dr. Penna is immediate past president of NYSCA and remains active on assorted committees and the organization’s goals of protecting NY patients and Doctors of Chiropractic rights to equal healthcare access and reimbursement.
made a lifetime contribution of lasting significance toward the advancement of chiropractic in the scientific and academic communities, and the public acceptance of the profession.
The deadline for paper submission for presentation at the conference is January 15, 2011. Those also go the AHC office, address above.
Increasingly the New York State Board for Chiropractic has been receiving questions and concerns about certain types of advertising. The information provided in this brief article may help clarify some of the responsibilities we have as practitioners when we advertise.
The New York State Board for Chiropractic frequently receives requests for information regarding spinal decompression from practicing doctors and from the general public.These treatments can become expensive and often are not covered by insurance. Coding for these services can also be confusing. There were a series of articles recently authored by James Edwards, D.C and Cynthia Vaughn,D.C.,F.I.C.C. which were published in Dynamic Chiropractic from the middle of 2008 through March of 2009.These articles would be of interest for anyone considering decompression in their practice. These should not be considered a complete guide but rather a starting point.
The most recent meeting of The New York State Board for Chiropractic was October 2009 in NYC.
The American Chiropractic Association (ACA) hosted its annual meeting in Newport, RI September 30-October 2, 2010. The 2010 ACA Alternate Delegate of the Year was awarded to Louis Lupinacci, DC, FICC. Dr. Lupinacci is the ACA NY Downstate Alternate Delegate and current NYSCA Vice President. Accepting the award on behalf of Dr. Lupinacci was Dr. H. William Wolfson ACA NY Downstate Delegate. Dr. Wolfson acknowledged Dr. Lupinacci’s service to the ACA, “Mild mannered, bright, even tempered, kind, professional, gentleman are only a few of the words you can use to describe this respected, admired and loved doctor … He is deserving of this prestigious ACA award and honor”. Dr. Wolfson added how appropriate it was for Dr. Lupinacci to receive this award in Rhode Island, as Dr. Lupinacci was born here! NYSCA extends our best wishes to Dr. Lupinacci on this well deserved award and the ACA by recognizing Dr. Lupinacci for his service to the profession, its doctors and patients!
"We ain't one-at-a-timin' here. We're MASS communicating!'" - Pappy O'Daniel
If you think of Facebook as a place for high schoolers and soccer moms, think again. Facebook has quickly earned a following of over 500,000,000 fanatical users who tune in early and often every day. Moreover, as of March 2010, Facebook surpassed Google in daily pageviews. However, that alone is not the reason to make Facebook a part of your chiropractic online advertising strategy.
EVERYONE KNOWS WHEN YOU "LIKE" SOMEONE
Until now, when a new patient found you via Google, Yahoo, Bing, Dogpile, or NYSCA.com, how many friends could you assume they'd tell about your site. Answer: zero. They might make it a bookmark or favorite but probably did not tell anyone else about your site at least not until after their first appointment. THIS IS WHERE FACEBOOK CHANGES THE MARKETING GAME.
HOW does Facebook spread the word virally?
(Arlington, Va.) -- The Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters (CCGPP), with assistance from the American Chiropractic Association (ACA), has established terminology that describes chiropractic care using conventionally recognized terminology across the accepted continuum of care. The terminology was established by a formal consensus process conducted in early 2009.
The chiropractic profession is making great strides with integration among health care providers and insurers. Doctors of chiropractic now practice in many military and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) sites, in hospital settings and in a variety of integrated practice models. As our nation’s health care landscape changes and the primary care shortage becomes more acute, the stage will be set for even more integration of doctors of chiropractic among other health care providers—traditional and alternative. Therefore, it is vital that the scope of appropriate chiropractic care be clearly defined relative to overall patient case management.
The terminology that was established by the CCGPP consensus process relates to levels of care across the spectrum from acute care, to chronic/recurrent care and on to wellness care. The process specifically defined the following:
The two-year randomised clinical trial is the largest to study the effect of B vitamins on mild cognitive impairment, and one of the first disease-modifying trials in the Alzheimer’s field to show positive results in people.
Around 1 in 6 elderly people over the age of 70 has mild cognitive impairment, experiencing problems with memory, language, or other mental functions, but not to a degree that interferes with daily life. Around half of people with mild cognitive impairment go on to develop dementia – mainly Alzheimer’s disease – within five years of diagnosis.
Certain B vitamins – folic acid, vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 – are known to control levels of the amino acid homocysteine in the blood, and high levels of homocysteine are associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer’s.
So the Oxford team set out to see whether supplements of the B vitamins that lower homocysteine could slow the higher rate of brain shrinkage, or atrophy, observed in mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s.
The study followed 168 volunteers aged 70 or over with mild memory problems, half of whom took high dose B vitamin tablets for two years and the other half a placebo tablet. The researchers assessed disease progression in this group by using MRI scans to measure the brain atrophy rate over a two-year period. The findings are published in the journal PLoS ONE.
The team found that on average the brains of those taking the folic acid, vitamin B6 and B12 treatment shrank at a rate of 0.76% a year, while those in the placebo group had a mean brain shrinkage rate of 1.08%. People with the highest levels of homocysteine benefited most, showing atrophy rates on treatment that were half of those on placebo.
Along with rate of brain shrinkage, the team from the Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Ageing (OPTIMA) also monitored cognitive test scores, revealing that those with the slowest rate of shrinkage scored more strongly.
The team suggests that, since the rate of brain atrophy is known to be more rapid in those with mild cognitive impairment who go on to develop Alzheimer’s, it is possible that the vitamin treatment could slow down the development of the disease. Clinical trials to test this should now be carried out, they add.
‘It is our hope that this simple and safe treatment will delay the development of Alzheimer’s disease in many people who suffer from mild memory problems,’ said Professor David Smith of the Department of Pharmacology at Oxford University, a co-leader of the trial. ‘Today there are about 1.5 million elderly in UK, 5 million in USA and 14 million in Europe with such memory problems.
‘These are immensely promising results but we do need to do more trials to conclude whether these particular B vitamins can slow or prevent development of Alzheimer’s. So I wouldn’t yet recommend that anyone getting a bit older and beginning to be worried about memory lapses should rush out and buy vitamin B supplements without seeing a doctor,’ he said.
Rebecca Wood, Chief Executive of the Alzheimer’s Research Trust, which co-funded the study, said: ‘These are very important results, with B vitamins now showing a prospect of protecting some people from Alzheimer’s in old age. The strong findings must inspire an expanded trial to follow people expected to develop Alzheimer’s, and we hope for further success.
‘We desperately need to support research into dementia, to help avoid the massive increases of people living with the condition as the population ages. Research is the only answer to what remains the greatest medical challenge of our time.’
Professor Chris Kennard, chair of the Medical Research Council’s Neurosciences and Mental Health Board which co-funded the study, said: ‘This MRC-funded trial brings us a step closer to unravelling the complex neurobiology of ageing and cognitive decline, which holds the key to the development of future treatments for conditions like Alzheimer’s disease. The findings are very encouraging and we look forward to further research that is needed in order to test whether B vitamins can be recommended as a suitable treatment.’